Life Management: HSoftware (Human Software) for Higher Effectiveness

Preview the book “HSoftware (The Only Key to Higher Effectiveness)” at this link: https://read.amazon.in/kp/embed?asin=B0051OS2TQ&asin=B0051OS2TQ&preview=newtab&linkCode=kpe&ref_=cm_sw_r_kb_dp_deZLxb7GK01B9

HSoftware

If one keeps harping “this is the way I’m” or “this is what I’m” (and always taking pride in it), then he/she can forget becoming “better”.

“HSoftware (Human Software) explains that though each human being is unique and that uniqueness may be worthy of appreciation, yet, it does not guarantee effectiveness in each one of them. The acquisition of more correct and appropriate HSoftware and its strict practice alone can make one more effective.

The concept “HSoftware” is fully uncovered in the book “HSoftware (Human Software) (The Only Key to Higher Effectiveness)”. The book explains the most fundamental constituent elements of HSoftware in an interesting way.

Shyam Bhatawdekar is the creator of this word “HSoftware” and its associated concepts.

You can acquire the book “HSoftware (Human Software) (The Only Key to Higher Effectiveness)” from Amazon. You can order online on Amazon by searching for the title “HSoftware (Human Software) (The Only Key to Higher Effectiveness)” authored by Shyam Bhatawdekar. The book is available as an eBook as well as in paperback (printed book). Preview the book at: https://read.amazon.in/kp/embed?asin=B0051OS2TQ&asin=B0051OS2TQ&preview=newtab&linkCode=kpe&ref_=cm_sw_r_kb_dp_deZLxb7GK01B9

HSoftware Is Acquired

Human being is not capable of doing much at the birth. It is just flesh and blood, bones and skin and brain circuitry- the neuron etc. Then what makes humans tick?

It’s their software (the HSoftware)- the programming of their main memories- their minds. And this software is majorly acquired from outside.

It is loaded in human beings in far more complex ways than the ways in which it is loaded in a computer. But largely software is an acquired entity, acquired from outside. Better and more software acquisition is likely to make a human being first more effective and then more efficient. There is no end to how much effective a human being needs to be and therefore, the acquisition of the software by the human mind or brain can be incessant.

These outsiders from whom the human beings draw their software are the environment: parents, siblings, neighbors, schools, teachers, friends, books, magazines, television, movies, Internet, travel, employer organizations, bosses, subordinates, professional associates, service providers, strangers, events, incidents, accidents and what have you. The list is unending; it can go on and on. From these sources, the HSoftware gets picked up by the human being either consciously or subconsciously.

And remember, almost all of HSoftware of a human being is acquired from the environment. All of it does not come along with the hardware (of human being- the brain & body) at the time of birth.

However, some people suggest that human beings bring along with them some HSoftware at the time of birth. They call it genetic determinism. You have it imbedded in the genes for which, it is believed that your previous seven or so generations are responsible. Your grandparents or great grandparents might have been genius and you inherited a part of it in your DNA and that’s why you seem to exude some brilliance occasionally or they were temperamental guys and therefore, you too are quite temperamental. In a way this kind of genetically determined HSoftware, if it at all exists, is also an acquired HSoftware. However, it is suggested by the knowledgeable people that this genetic determinism may be responsible to shape up only a small percentage of the total personality of a human being.

Yet, in finality, the extent of quantity and quality of HSoftware acquired genetically or learnt later on after the birth by a human being, consciously or subconsciously, is really what matters and when it differs between two or more human beings each one of them becomes a unique human being.

Every Human Being Is Unique (but may not be quite effective)

One person’s food is other person’s poison- thus goes the famous saying. The reasons for such stark differences between two persons and in other cases not so stark differences between two people could be many. Basically the differences arise out of the way different people are differently made up of- the differences arising out of the differences in their HSoftware.

And if you ask them the reason of adopting their particular ways, they will tell you the reasons quite intelligently and with great sentimentality and try to convince you that theirs is the best way.

In thousands of our seminars for general public and for people of the corporate sector, we have invariably found that the seminar participants’ response to any of the management exercises or case studies we give them to solve is not the same. Most times, it is pretty different from each other.

When we make them to discuss and sort out their differences in their choices of solutions and come to a common most effective viewpoint, more than 99% times, no consensus is arrived. They agree to disagree. At times, they lose their control in the discussions, become emotional, start talking lose, getting personal, start shouting, taking row with each other, abusing others and only short of fisticuffs.

Interesting? Yes, it is. Everyone displays his uniqueness. Everyone has different look at the same topic, everyone thinks and argues his stand differently and not willing to buzz.

Do you think everyone’s solution is more correct and more effective? May be someone’s is but not everyone’s.

But when we ask them to add 2 + 3, everyone, yes, everyone gives the same (best and only answer): addition of 2 + 3 is 5. There is no argument, there is no conflict.

Why?? Think.

We see unanimity in the problem of simple addition of two numbers Why? It is because of the “human software (the HSoftware)”, the “programming of mind”. However in non-mathematical problems everyone’s “human software” is not the same. In case of a simple addition problem (2 + 3 = ?), everyone uses exactly same and precise and correct “human software”. Adding 2 and 3 is a very simple problem in arithmetic and if one has learnt the elementary math; one can solve it to arrive at exactly the same answer i.e. 5.

In learning mathematics all of us get conditioned to think exactly in the same manner. We learn that there can be just one answer to the problem and a precise method is taught to arrive at that solution. Everyone accepts that kind of learning. Those who learn and apply that knowledge perfectly well always arrive at one solution unanimously. There is not an iota of dissension or conflict among them. Then, they do not remain unique any more as far as solving mathematical problem is concerned.

But other than mathematics and some exact sciences no where such a phenomenon of arriving at only one exact solution by all the people having the required HSoftware occurs. In math and science if you happen to acquire a correct HSoftware, you get it perfectly right otherwise you just don’t get it. But rest of the life is not all mathematics and exact sciences. Here even with imperfect and incomplete HSoftware acquisition, people do stumble on some solutions which seem acceptable to them though may not be as correct as they should be.

And then various people use or apply these various imperfect solutions they came up with by using their varying degrees of HSoftware. They apply them in their personal, family, professional and social spheres of life and become effective to various degrees in getting various degrees of successes.

More Appropriate and More Correct HSoftware Give Higher Effectiveness

We saw in the earlier description that the human uniqueness comes from each one’s “human software (the HSoftware)”. And this “human software” is responsible also for the most correct or less correct or least correct solutions to the problems in personal, professional, family and social life of individuals.

So some people may have wrong answers or solutions and they will be least effective. Those with relatively more correct answers will be little more effective. And those who are closest to the answers or who can find the right answers will be most effective.

Philosophically speaking, life is all about finding the right or the most correct answers- the truth or getting closer to it. The mankind is busy doing it all the time from time immemorial. Those who reach the truth or nearer to truth- i.e. the more correct or most correct answers to life’s various issues and problems, are more effective than those who are away from it. And the strength to achieve this comes from the quality and quantity of HSoftware they possess and continually upgrade throughout their lives.

Four Fundamental Factors Are Responsible for Shaping Your HSoftware

After distilling the data collected in hundreds of our seminars involving thousands of people from different age groups, genders, educational and experience backgrounds and also, from our observations of large number of people during our 40 years of experience as business executives and management consultants in the corporate sector, we have arrived on an understanding that the “human software (HSoftware)” or “programming of mind” consists of following four absolutely fundamental elements or factors:

1. Human beliefs or human value structure
2. Knowledge and information base (rational, emotional and spiritual) (here, spiritual knowledge has no relationship with rituals connected with organized religions and gods)
3. Paradigms (day-to-day mindsets or thinking patterns)
4. Willpower (desire, motivation and enthusiasm) to do, act or execute as well as to think, feel and learn which also involves action or doing (responsible for even gaining insight into values, knowledge and paradigms as well as for development of competencies and skills)

It is very difficult to know the sequence in which the human mind acquires these four fundamental elements of HSoftware. Or is it sequential at all? Is it simultaneous or multi-tasking? Perhaps it may also be true that one element gives a trigger or push to another element(s). This push could be any to any, any to many, many to any and many to many. Is it easier to guess which element is acquired first in the beginning of human life? Perhaps “will power to do” is acquired first or is it “knowledge”? Can’t be too sure.

But one thing is sure, the four elements are always in loops, taking the shape of twisters, the sequence of the elements in the successive loops of the twister may vary.

These four factors are all in the human mind- that’s why they are “software”- the HSoftware.

It is important to repeat that the “human software (HSoftware)” or “programming of mind” consists of following four absolutely fundamental elements or factors:

1. Human beliefs or human value structure
2. Knowledge and information base (rational, emotional and spiritual) (here, spiritual knowledge has no relationship with rituals connected with organized religions and gods)
3. Paradigms (day-to-day mindsets or thinking patterns)
4. Willpower (desire, motivation and enthusiasm) to do, act or execute as well as to think, feel and learn which also involves action or doing (responsible for even gaining insight into values, knowledge and paradigms as well as for development of competencies and skills)

Correct and necessary acquisition, understanding and implementation of the above mentioned four factors give higher effectiveness to human beings. And higher effectiveness leads to desired success.

More Correct HSoftware Gives Better Effectiveness Followed by Better Efficiency.

Effective Hsoftware directs you to look at the effectiveness first and then the efficiency. Therefore one must clearly understand the distinction between effectiveness and efficiency. Effectiveness is doing right things whereas efficiency is is doing things right. Doing wrong things right way leads us nowhere. That’s why effectiveness should come first and efficiency later. Better HSoftware does it.

“Effectiveness” is all about finding the right destination and right direction and right path to reach the chosen destination. “Efficiency” is reaching the right destination on this chosen path with the usage of optimized resources. For example, how soon will I cross milestones after milestones and how fast will I reach the destination and so how fast can I traverse?

If you do efficiency first, you may start traversing fast on any path, in any direction (without consideration of the destination), in the over zealousness of traversing faster (efficiency). But with this higher speed of traversing, you may end up proceeding in wrong direction, on wrong path and away from the desired destination, faster. What’s the use? It’s waste of resources though you have been efficient in traversing. But your destination was all wrong.

Related Book

Read everything about this concept “HSoftware” and its practice in the book titled “HSoftware (Human Software) (The Only Key to Higher Effectiveness)”. The book is also available under the title “HSoftware (Shyam Bhatawdekar’s Effectiveness Model)”. Contents of the two titles are the same. The book is available from Amazon as an eBook as well as a paperback (printed book).

Please check this book for its preview (first few chapters of the book) at this link: http://amzn.in/2zP9RmZ 

Share
Posted in Boundaryless Management, Branding, Change Management, Creativity, Ethical Management, Family Counseling, General Counseling, General Management, Global Management, Home Management, Human Resource Management, Innovation Management, Leadership, Life Management, Life Skills, Management Education, Parental Counseling, Personal Branding, Personal Effectiveness, Personality Development, Professional Branding, Professional Counseling, Quality Management, Soft Skills, Strategy Management, Training and Development | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Global Economy: Parity

Knowledge workers of every rank and category as well as unskilled workers in every organization deserve far more emoluments than what are doled out currently (and this has been the dismal story over the past many centuries). They add tremendous value- they form the critical resource. The founders, CEOs and investors alone cannot run any organization by themselves. Remove all the workers and see what happens!! So the workers’ knowledge and skills are as important as the money and management provided by the founders, CEOs and investors. Therefore, there has to be a significant parity in payments and sharing the profits.

Related Reading

Why only 1% of the people should have 99% of world’s wealth?: http://shyam.bhatawdekar.net/index.php/2015/12/17/why-should-only-1-of-the-worlds-people-should-have-all-the-99-worlds-wealth-blatant-social-injustice/

Screwed up Global Economy: http://shyam.bhatawdekar.net/index.php/2012/06/27/screwed-up-global-economy/

Share
Posted in Boundaryless Management, Change Management, Cost Management, Creativity, Economics, Ethical Management, Finance Management, General Management, Global Management, Human Resource Management, Human Rights, Innovation Management, Leadership, Life Management, Life Skills, Money Management, Personal Effectiveness, Personality Development, Political Management, Principles of Management, Strategy Management | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why Should the Members of Parliament of Any Country be Paid if They Don’t Work?

“No Work, No Pay” is Followed in Every Organization for Everyone and Members of Parliament Can’t Get Scot Free if They Don’t Work

Members of Parliament (MPs) can’t be exception to the rule “no work, no pay”.

The case in point is the recent happenings in Indian parliament. Similar happenings took place even in the earlier washed out sessions over past several years.  It must be happening in other parts of the world too some time or other.

In India, almost all of its parliament’s sessions were wasted with no work done in the recent past. Why should MPs get their salaries and allowances for the days parliament did not conduct its business due to continued disruption? The parliament was totally paralysed for a number of  successive days over the issues that were the creation of the MPs of the ruling party as well as the parties in opposition.

The two houses (Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha) lost unimaginably large number of hours of work. They hardly worked at all. A huge sum of Rupees 3 to 4 crores is spent on both the houses everyday. So you can calculate the crores and crores of public money that is lost due to non-working of the MPs.

A simple worker in a factory or office does not get his salary if he does not work. Then why should the highly paid MPs at such important and responsible position be paid if they do not work?

Any sane person of a little logic will say, “Not only daily allowance but the entire salary and perquisites of such MPs should also be deducted for the days they do not work and contribute.”

Such actions alone will compel the MPs to behave and work. Such an action will certainly send a strong message across. Some wiser people will even suggest that the non-working MPs should in fact be penalized heavily for wasting public money.

However some people may argue with tongue in cheek, “Whether you pay them or don’t pay them does not matter much to them since they earn more than that from some other (?) sources. They do not solely depend on their salaries, perquisites and allowances.”

But seriously, the MPs should be paid only based on their true contribution to the society. We talk of result orientation everywhere. Start with the MPs to set an example to the rest of the citizens of the country.

Share
Posted in Boundaryless Management, Change Management, Cost Management, Creativity, Economics, Ethical Management, Finance Management, General Counseling, General Management, Global Management, Human Resource Management, Human Rights, Innovation Management, Leadership, Money Management, Operations Management, Personal Effectiveness, Personality Development, Political Management, Principles of Management, Professional Counseling, Quality Management, Stress Management, Time Management | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment